situation

IRI:: http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/situation.owl

Current version :: 1.1 added rdfs:isDefinedBy for all named entities

Imported Ontologies :: http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/schemas/cpannotationschema.owl (visualise it with LODE )

Extracted from :: (visualise it with LODE )

Covers requirements :: - What is the context or situation of something? What are the things present in this context or situation?

Has Consequences :: - We can contextualize things that have something in common, or are associated: a same place, time, view, causal link, systemic dependence, etc. We can also reify n-ary relations as situations.

Has Intent :: - To represent contexts or situations, and the things that are contextualized.

Scenarios :: - The lecture was held in January 1921 by Bela Fleck, with some physicians in the audience making questions, in a very relaxed athmosphere.

Other visualisation :: Ontology source - WebVowl

Classes

Situation

Situation^c back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/situation.owl#Situation

is defined by: http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/situation.owl

A view on a set of entities. It can be seen as a 'relational context', reifying a relation. For example, a PlanExecution is a context including some actions executed by agents according to certain parameters and expected tasks to be achieved from a Plan; a DiagnosedSituation is a context of observed entities that is interpreted on the basis of a Diagnosis, etc. Situation is also able to represent reified n-ary relations, where isSettingFor is the top-level relation for all binary projections of the n-ary relation. If used in a transformation pattern for n-ary relations, the designer should take care of: - creating only one situation for each instance of an n-ary relation, otherwise the 'identification constraint' (Calvanese et al., IJCAI 2001) could be violated - adding an 'exact cardinality' restriction corresponding to the arity of the n-ary relation, otherwise the designer would actually represent a polymorphic relation.

has super-classes: is setting for^op min 1
is in domain of: is setting for^op
is in range of: has setting^op

has setting^op back to ToC or Object Property ToC

IRI: http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/situation.owl#hasSetting

is defined by: http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/situation.owl

A relation between entities and situations, e.g. 'this morning I've prepared my coffee with a new fantastic Arabica' (i.e.: (an amount of) a new fantastic Arabica hasSetting the preparation of my coffee this morning).

has domain: thing^c
has range: Situation^c
is inverse of: is setting for^op

is setting for^op back to ToC or Object Property ToC

IRI: http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/situation.owl#isSettingFor

is defined by: http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/situation.owl

has domain: Situation^c
has range: thing^c
is inverse of: has setting^op

Annotation Properties

comment
covers requirements
extracted from
has author
has consequences
has intent
is defined by
label
scenarios
version info

comment^ap back to ToC or Annotation Property ToC

IRI: http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment

covers requirements^ap back to ToC or Annotation Property ToC

IRI: http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/schemas/cpannotationschema.owl#coversRequirements

extracted from^ap back to ToC or Annotation Property ToC

IRI: http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/schemas/cpannotationschema.owl#extractedFrom

has author^ap back to ToC or Annotation Property ToC

IRI: http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/schemas/cpannotationschema.owl#hasAuthor

has consequences^ap back to ToC or Annotation Property ToC

IRI: http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/schemas/cpannotationschema.owl#hasConsequences

has intent^ap back to ToC or Annotation Property ToC

IRI: http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/schemas/cpannotationschema.owl#hasIntent

is defined by^ap back to ToC or Annotation Property ToC

IRI: http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy

label^ap back to ToC or Annotation Property ToC

IRI: http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label

scenarios^ap back to ToC or Annotation Property ToC

IRI: http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/schemas/cpannotationschema.owl#scenarios

version info^ap back to ToC or Annotation Property ToC

IRI: http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo

Namespace Declarations back to ToC

default namespace: http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/situation.owl#
cpannotationschema: http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/schemas/cpannotationschema.owl#
owl: http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
rdf: http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
rdfs: http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
schemas: http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/schemas/
situation: http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/situation.owl#
xsd: http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#

This HTML document was obtained by processing the OWL ontology source code through LODE, Live OWL Documentation Environment, developed by Silvio Peroni .

situation

Table of Content

Classes

Situationc back to ToC or Class ToC

Object Properties

has settingop back to ToC or Object Property ToC

is setting forop back to ToC or Object Property ToC

Annotation Properties

commentap back to ToC or Annotation Property ToC

covers requirementsap back to ToC or Annotation Property ToC

extracted fromap back to ToC or Annotation Property ToC

has authorap back to ToC or Annotation Property ToC

has consequencesap back to ToC or Annotation Property ToC

has intentap back to ToC or Annotation Property ToC

is defined byap back to ToC or Annotation Property ToC

labelap back to ToC or Annotation Property ToC

scenariosap back to ToC or Annotation Property ToC

version infoap back to ToC or Annotation Property ToC